#Svn client linux update
#Svn client linux windows

In the menu bar click Subversion -> Working Copy -> Check for unversioned items. I'm not sure what version of kdesvn you were using, but the version I'm running (0.7.2) has the feature you're looking for.

It is so good: you can manage the repository in a very confortable way, also create a standard project so you can make and add code. But I have used Cervisa(GUI for CVS) - I have to say that that is a better tool - it is more integrated into the environment and editors in KDE. I never used TortoiseSVN, so I cannot compare the two. In RapidSVN you can select everything and use Add Recursive

Its not that much painful to google for them, but it would help. You could add some links to the tools you mentioned. Command line may be the last refuge for the hardcore, but not everything that is on the M side of the computer world must be thrown away just because some people think they are the devil. I spent 3 hours over the web trying to get something graphical. It seems every tortoiseSVN user that migrates to linux will have the same shock. ДЄ little late, but did you try SmartSVN? /johan/ There is a request for this in the GNOME Nautilus VCS bug repository: I don't know what the status is or how much of the tortoiseSVN functionality has been implemented.ДЇor more info, google 'nautilus vcs svn', e.g.

#Svn client linux windows

Or better yet, lets get a TortoiseSVN style GUI for Subversion on Linux!!!!!! I use Windows at work and TortoiseSVN rocks.

#Svn client linux update

All the tools I tried only implemented update and commit as they should, 'add' and 'status' need to be connected. We can do checkout manually, we can do merging and other once-a-year stuff manually. To all those 'Linux desktop' proponents: If you want to see quality Linux desktop - make some pressure on developers of these tools (I'm trying by posting this on my blog).ДЄll they need to implement is 4 basic svn commands:ДЄnd they need to do it properly. Sometimes I run svn status in terminal, and then hunt for files in GUI. Given all this, I'm still using command-line svn from terminal most of the time. Why do tool makers add some extra-cool-whatever-used-by-nobody features instead of adding the esential ones? It really escapes me. KDEsvn seems quite good, but it has a lot of background 'syncing' with the repository (I think I've seen the option to turn it off, but didn't bother). It is clean - so it's easy to spot the changes, and it doesn't flicker like RapidSVN. Who ever uses that feature I wonder?ДЄnyway, from all those, I prefer eSVN for its user interface. I tried to circumvent the problem by running the 'status' command, but eSVN for example lists all files, since it envokes 'svn status' with verbose flag. I only catch the problem when I (or someone else) figure it is missing when working on another computer. Sometimes I even add a file somewhere deep in directory structure, and forget about. They all require that you pin-point each file. Unfortunately, none of those Linux programs have it. TortoiseSVN (Subversion client from MS Windows) does it the proper way:ДЄ) run 'svn status', and take all the files returned by itД«) show that list with checkboxes so user can pick which of those unversioned files (s)he wants to add When you add a lot of files in your working copy, you should be able to painlessly add them to repository. They all have a single problem in common. As I use Linux as my main OS, I started the quest to find a suitable graphical SVN client for Linux. After I've seen how good it is, I switched all my projects as well (even the commercial stuff I'm working on).

Some time ago, all the projects I'm involved in, switched from CVS to Subversion.